{"id":77598,"date":"2024-03-12T15:41:15","date_gmt":"2024-03-12T20:41:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/equitynewsreport.com\/ghislaine-maxwell-faces-skeptical-panel-in-appeal-of-us-sex-trafficking-conviction\/"},"modified":"2024-03-12T15:41:15","modified_gmt":"2024-03-12T20:41:15","slug":"ghislaine-maxwell-faces-skeptical-panel-in-appeal-of-us-sex-trafficking-conviction","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/equitynewsreport.com\/h\/ghislaine-maxwell-faces-skeptical-panel-in-appeal-of-us-sex-trafficking-conviction\/","title":{"rendered":"Ghislaine Maxwell faces skeptical panel in appeal of US sex trafficking conviction"},"content":{"rendered":"<div readability=\"106\">\n<div id=\"imgCarousel\" class=\"imgCarousel\">\n<img decoding=\"async\" alt=\"Ghislaine Maxwell faces skeptical panel in appeal of US sex trafficking conviction\" id=\"carouselImage\" src=\"https:\/\/i-invdn-com.investing.com\/trkd-images\/LYNXNPEK2B0AR_L.jpg\"><br \/>\n<span class=\"text\">\u00a9 Reuters. Jeffrey Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell sits as the guilty verdict in her sex abuse trial is read in a courtroom sketch in New York City, U.S., December 29, 2021. REUTERS\/Jane Rosenberg\/File Photo<\/span><br \/>\n<i class=\"imgGrad\"><\/i>\n<\/div>\n<p>By Jonathan Stempel<\/p>\n<p>NEW YORK (Reuters) -A U.S. appeals court on Tuesday appeared resistant to overturning Ghislaine Maxwell&#8217;s 2021 conviction for helping the disgraced late financier Jeffrey Epstein sexually abuse teenage girls.<\/p>\n<p>The Manhattan-based 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals considered arguments by a lawyer for Maxwell that Epstein&#8217;s 2007 non-prosecution agreement with federal prosecutors in Florida should have barred the British socialite&#8217;s prosecution in Manhattan 13 years later.<\/p>\n<p>Maxwell, 62, is serving a 20-year prison sentence after being convicted on five charges for having recruited and groomed four underage girls for Epstein, once her boyfriend, to abuse between 1994 and 2004.<\/p>\n<p>Her lawyer Diana Fabi Samson said references in Epstein&#8217;s agreement to the &#8220;United States&#8221; signaled an intent to bar prosecutions nationwide of his &#8220;potential co-conspirators,&#8221; four of whom were identified by name. Maxwell was not among them.<\/p>\n<p>Circuit Judge Richard Wesley, however, said a U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) manual concerning non-prosecution agreements created a &#8220;strong presumption&#8221; that the Florida prosecutors could not bind their New York counterparts.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;I read the DOJ manual,&#8221; Wesley told Samson. &#8220;It suggests the opposite of what you just said.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Samson countered that the manual was &#8220;not a shield to allow the government to get out of its promises that it makes to criminal defendants who waive their constitutional rights and plead guilty.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Epstein ultimately pleaded guilty in 2008 to a Florida state prosecution charge and served 13 months in jail, an arrangement now widely considered too lenient.<\/p>\n<p>NOT BINDING IN MANHATTAN<\/p>\n<p>Andrew Rohrbach, who helped prosecute Maxwell, told the appeals court the reference to the United States in Epstein&#8217;s agreement was &#8220;generic,&#8221; and that the agreement was &#8220;intended to bind the Southern District of Florida, and that district alone.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Circuit Judge Jose Cabranes asked if anyone else was being investigated at the time, and thus might have been in the minds of Florida prosecutors. Rohrbach said no. <\/p>\n<p>The 2nd Circuit did not rule immediately, and could take months to issue a decision.<\/p>\n<p>Epstein died by suicide in August 2019 in a Manhattan jail, a little over a month after being arrested and also charged with sex trafficking.<\/p>\n<p>His victims have since recouped hundreds of millions of dollars from his estate and from banks accused of handling transactions that financed his sexual misconduct.<\/p>\n<p>The scandal has also stained or destroyed the reputations of former friends like Britain&#8217;s Prince Andrew and onetime Barclays CEO Jes Staley.<\/p>\n<p>In seeking to overturn Maxwell&#8217;s conviction, her lawyers have argued that prosecutors scapegoated her because Epstein was dead and &#8220;public outrage&#8221; demanded that prosecutors pin blame somewhere. They also said Maxwell&#8217;s trial was tainted because one juror did not disclose he had been sexually abused as a child.<\/p>\n<p>Prosecutors have argued that Maxwell did &#8220;incalculable&#8221; damage to her victims, and that a substantial sentence would show that &#8220;nobody is above the law.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Maxwell is housed in a low-security prison in Tallahassee, Florida. She is eligible for release in July 2037.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>\u00a9 Reuters. Jeffrey Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell sits as the guilty verdict in her sex abuse trial is read in a courtroom sketch in New York City, U.S., December 29, 2021. REUTERS\/Jane Rosenberg\/File Photo By Jonathan Stempel NEW YORK (Reuters) -A U.S. appeals court on Tuesday appeared resistant to overturning Ghislaine Maxwell&#8217;s 2021 conviction for helping the disgraced late financier Jeffrey Epstein sexually abuse teenage girls. The Manhattan-based 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals considered arguments by a lawyer for Maxwell that Epstein&#8217;s 2007 non-prosecution agreement with federal prosecutors in Florida should have barred the British socialite&#8217;s prosecution in Manhattan [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":77599,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/equitynewsreport.com\/h\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/77598"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/equitynewsreport.com\/h\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/equitynewsreport.com\/h\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/equitynewsreport.com\/h\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/equitynewsreport.com\/h\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=77598"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/equitynewsreport.com\/h\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/77598\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/equitynewsreport.com\/h\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/77599"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/equitynewsreport.com\/h\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=77598"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/equitynewsreport.com\/h\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=77598"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/equitynewsreport.com\/h\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=77598"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}