House passes broad resolution calling out racism, ‘anti-Semitic’ comments — without naming Ilhan Omar


After several days of infighting and a near-rebellion by rank-and-file Democrats, as well as a major last-minute revision, the House on Thursday overwhelmingly passed a bipartisan resolution that only indirectly condemned Minnesota Democratic Rep. Ilhan Omar’s repeated ‘anti-Semitic’ and ‘pernicious’ comments — without mentioning her by name.

The final vote was 407 to 23, with 23 Republicans voting no, and all Democrats voting yes. Iowa GOP Rep. Steve King, who faced his own bipartisan blowback for comments purportedly defending white nationalists, voted present.

The final draft of the resolution was expanded to condemn virtually all forms of bigotry, in what Republicans characterized as a cynical ploy to distract from Omar’s remarks. Texas Republican Rep. Louie Gohmert, speaking on the House floor to announce that he would vote against the resolution, remarked, “Now [the resolution] condemns just about everything. … Hatred for Israel is a special kind of hatred. It should never be watered down.”

Gohmert was joined in voting down the resolution by House Republican Conference Chair Liz Cheney, as well as Reps. Andy Biggs, Ken Buck, Michael Conaway, Chris Collins, Mike Rogers, Paul Gosar, Pete King, Rick Crawford, Ted Budd, Ted Yoho, Chip Roy, Dan Meuser, Jeff Duncan, Thomas Massie, Doug LaMalfa, Tom Graves, Steve Palazzo, Greg Steube, Mo Brooks, Mark Walker, and Michael Burgess.

“Today’s resolution vote was a sham put forward by Democrats to avoid condemning one of their own and denouncing vile anti-Semitism,” Cheney said in a statement. “While I stand whole heartedly against discrimination outlined in this resolution, the language before the House today did not address the issue that is front and center.”

Cheney called Thursday “a sad day for the House” and called for Omar’s removal from the House Foreign Affairs Committee, just as Republicans stripped King of his committee assignments in January.

The lead-up to the vote on the resolution to condemn all “forms of hatred” exposed a growing rift between House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., and the far-left progressive freshman contingent — including not only Omar, but also Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., Rashida Tlaib, D-Mich., and others — that has emerged as a major challenge to her control over the House.

During debate on the House floor over the resolution, Rep. Ted Deutch, a Florida Democrat, slammed his party’s leaders for hesitating to sharply condemn Omar, and remarked that supporting language condemning anti-Semitism “shouldn’t be this hard.

“Why are we unable to singularly condemn anti-Semitism?” Deutch asked. “It feels like we’re only able to call out the use of anti-Semitic language by a colleague of ours — any colleague of ours — if we’re addressing all forms of hatred. It feels like we can’t say it’s anti-Semitism unless everyone agrees it’s anti-Semitism.”

Apparently fed up with her party’s inability to come together to condemn anti-Semitism in the past week, Pelosi reportedly even dropped her microphone and stormed out of a meeting with junior Democrats on Wednesday, amid fierce disputes over the planning and wording of the resolution. And, on Thursday, Pelosi offered something of a strained excuse for the 37-year-old Omar, saying at a news conference, “I do not believe that she understood the full weight of the words.”

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., after speaking with reporters during her weekly news conference Thursday on Capitol Hill. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., after speaking with reporters during her weekly news conference Thursday on Capitol Hill. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)

The final text of the resolution reflected the Democrats’ deep internal divisions on the matter. It began by rejecting the “perpetuation of anti-Semitic stereotypes in the United States and around the world, including the pernicious myth of dual loyalty and foreign allegiance, especially in the context of support for the United States-Israel alliance.”

Although the resolution stops short of using Omar’s name, that provision was a transparent reference to her remarks at a progressive Washington cafe last week, in which she suggested that Israel supporters were pushing for U.S. politicians to declare “allegiance” to Israel.


The accusation that Jewish politicians could be vulnerable to having “dual loyalties” has been made for centuries in various contexts, and has been seen widely as a religious-based attack intent on undermining their leadership. Tlaib, who was seated next to Omar during her comments at the cafe, made a similar comment in January, tweeting that Senate Republicans were more loyal to Israel than to their own country.

The resolution also “condemns anti-Semitic acts and statements as hateful expressions of intolerance that are contradictory to the values that define the people of the United States.”

Last month, Omar ignited a bipartisan uproar across the country when she suggested on Twitter that some members of Congress have been paid by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee to support Israel. AIPAC is a nonprofit organization that works to influence U.S. policy. (“Let me be really clear,” New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio, a Democrat, said. “Suggesting that support for Israel is beholden to a foreign power is absolutely unacceptable and illogical too.”)


Omar — who also tweeted in 2012 that “Israel has hypnotized the world, may Allah awaken the people and help them see the evil doings of Israel” — refused to address questions on Wednesday about accusations that she’s anti-Semitic.

Fox News had been told the Democratic caucus was concerned about mentioning Omar by name — a non-starter for many members of the Congressional Black Caucus. Two knowledgable sources said such a scenario could increase security threats against Omar, who is Muslim.

But, Democrats went to great lengths to broaden the resolution’s focus far beyond Omar’s comments. A vote on the resolution was delayed briefly to add a new clause condemning other forms of bigotry, reportedly in response to concerns from members representing minority groups who felt left out.

 “I do not believe that she understood the full weight of the words.”

— House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, on Ilhan Omar

Specifically, the new clause stated: “Whereas white supremacists in the United States have exploited and continue to exploit bigotry and weaponize hate for political gain, targeting traditionally persecuted peoples, including African Americans, Latinos, Native Americans, Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders and other people of color, Jews, Muslims, Hindus, Sikhs, the LGBTQ community, immigrants, and others with verbal attacks, incitement, and violence.”

Conservative commentators mocked the dramatic, seemingly limitless expansion of the language, with Ben Shapiro writing, “This resolution must not pass until it includes condemnation of hatred against the disabled.”

The resolution also “condemns anti-Muslim discrimination and 23 bigotry against all minorities as contrary to the values of the United States.”

It further “encourages all public officials to confront the reality of anti-Semitism, Islamophobia, racism, and other forms of bigotry, as well as historical struggles against them, to ensure that the United States will live up to the transcendent principles of tolerance, religious freedom, and equal protection as embodied in the Declaration of Independence and the first and amendments to the Constitution.”

Rep. Rashida Tlaib joined protesters with CREDO Action and By the People, a new advocacy group pushing for the impeachment of President Trump. Together they urged members of Congress to begin impeachment proceedings. (Rep. Rashida Tlaib)

Rep. Rashida Tlaib joined protesters with CREDO Action and By the People, a new advocacy group pushing for the impeachment of President Trump. Together they urged members of Congress to begin impeachment proceedings. (Rep. Rashida Tlaib)

That language mirrored comments by Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., on Tuesday, when he told Fox News, “I think every senator should condemn anti-Semitism. … What Congresswoman Omar said was wrong and hurtful — and those who tried to connect 9/11 to all Muslims in West Virginia were wrong as well.”

Responding to a comment from Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., that there was an increase in anti-Semitism among freshman House Democrats, Schumer retorted: “Why doesn’t Senator McConnell talk about those who marched in Charlottesville?”

Republicans did not specifically name King, R-Iowa, in a bipartisan disapproval measure that followed comments that seemingly defended white nationalism earlier this year. But, GOP leaders stripped King of his committee assignments as punishment — while Omar remains on the House Foreign Affairs Committee and Democrats have said they have no plans to oust her.

Many 2020 Democratic hopefuls, meanwhile, lined up to support Omar — including Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren. Others have preferred to duck the issue.

Asked about Omar at a news conference Thursday, Sen. Cory Booker, D-N.J., insisted he wanted to hear only “on-topic” questions about unrelated legislation — then, receiving none, stop taking questions entirely.


Top Republicans, however, have said the line between fair criticism of Israel and outright bigotry clearly had been crossed.

“Yeah, I can understand the settlement policy is being criticized,” South Carolina Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham told Fox News on Thursday. “I can understand sometimes the actions Israel takes are disproportionate. But the point is, this wasn’t about Israeli policy; it was about what the Jews do — that the Jews control the media, and the Jews used their money to buy favors. That’s the oldest anti-Semitic play in the book.”

Fox News’ Chad Pergram and Alex Pappas contributed to this report.

Source: Fox News

Subscribe to Equity Extra

Recieve the Latest Updates on Breakout Stocks

Subscribe to Equity News Report’s ‘Equity Extra’ Alerts list to be the first to learn about Premium Nasdaq Stocks before they Breakout


Leave a reply